Xing Dao Chen vs Bekkhan Atlangeriev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Sep at 06:04 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
X. Dao Chen vs B. Atlangeriev

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chen 1 - 0 Atlangeriev
They have played 3 sets in total, with Xing Dao Chen winning 2 and Bekkhan Atlangeriev winning 1. The last match between Xing Dao Chen and Bekkhan Atlangeriev was at the M15 Hong Kong, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Xing Dao Chen getting the victory 3-6 6-3 4-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chen | 1 |
| Atlangeriev | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Hong Kong(09-04-25)
X. D. Chen vs B. Atlangeriev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.10% (69-54) | Career Total W/L | 51.70% (137-128) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
X. D. Chen vs B. Atlangeriev Match Preview:
- Chen has recently won 38.64% of points on their second serve, compared to Atlangeriev's 46.22%. Could serve consistency indicate potential match outcomes? Possibly.
- When returning second serves, Chen wins 47.66% of points, slightly outperforming Atlangeriev at 44.91%. Is this a critical edge for Chen? Yes, it might be.
- For first serve returns, both players are nearly equal, with Chen at 27.26% and Atlangeriev at 27.13%. Does this parity affect their competitive positions? It levels the playing field.
- Under pressure, Atlangeriev edges out Chen in breakpoint saves, with 51.74% versus 49.47%. Does this hint at psychological resilience in tough situations? It suggests so.
- Looking at match wins over the past year, Atlangeriev has a superior win rate of 67.19% compared to Chen's 53.33%. Does historical data favor Atlangeriev? Yes, it does.
- On indoor hard courts, Chen’s win rate is 62%, whereas Atlangeriev's best performance is on hard courts at 55%. Which surfaces favor each player? Hard surfaces favor both but slightly more for Chen.
- Chen mainly competes in $10K ITF events, winning 54.24% of matches, while Atlangeriev matches this level at a 69.35% win rate. Does tournament level influence predicted outcomes? Indeed, it indicates Atlangeriev's stronger performance.
- Evaluating opponent strength, Atlangeriev faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 220.66, while Chen’s opponents averaged 265.62. Does this impact predictions? Yes, stronger competition gives Atlangeriev an edge.
- In deciding sets, Chen has a marginal advantage, winning 53% versus Atlangeriev's 50%. Could this decide a closely contested match? It's possible.
- During this current event, monitoring in-form players is key. Who has shown better adaptability? The details depend on event-specific stats.
- Recent form shows Chen converts 31.07% of breakpoints, slightly better than Atlangeriev’s 29.73%. Could opportunities at crucial moments tilt the match? Potentially.
Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the potential outcomes for this upcoming tennis match, Atlangeriev's superior second serve performance presents a significant advantage over Chen. This could prove crucial across matches, given the strong correlation between second serve success and match results.
Despite both players exhibiting similar abilities in handling first serve returns, Chen has been more effective in securing points on their opponent's second serve. However, Atlangeriev boasts slightly superior breakpoint resilience, an essential factor when pressure mounts.
While Chen excels on indoor hard surfaces, Atlangeriev's broader experience, facing more formidable opponents, suggests a greater competitive edge. His ability to consistently perform against higher-caliber players could be pivotal.
With all factors considered, Atlangeriev emerges as the likely winner due to his consistency, resilience under pressure, and experience against stronger competitors. Expect his overall solid form to prove decisive in clinching victory.
Xing Dao Chen vs Bekkhan Atlangeriev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
X. D. Chen vs B. Atlangeriev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:24:47 | Average Match Time | 2:24:47 |
| 72% (49/68) | 1st Serve % | 65% (55/84) |
| 73% (36/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (35/55) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 42% (35/84) | Return Points Win % | 32% (22/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
X. D. Chen Recent Matches Played
B. Atlangeriev Recent Matches Played

X. D. Chen vs B. Atlangeriev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.10% (69/54) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.70% (137/128) |
| 54.55% (150/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.72% (310/278) |
| 52.87% (1336/1191) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (2828/2746) |
| 57.14% (56/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.97% (68/58) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.07% (53/55) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.61% (16/15) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 78 | Aces Total | 540 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 246 | Total Double Faults | 387 |
| 1:14:55 | Average Match Time | 1:1:22 |
| 262.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 319.55 |
| 66% (3260/4924) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6684/10880) |
| 62% (2028/3260) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (4439/6684) |
| 46% (763/1664) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2042/4196) |
| 43% (240/555) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (433/1035) |
| 42% (2120/5068) | Return Points Win % | 39% (4144/10573) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 58.47% (69/49) | Futures W/L | 52.92% (136/121) |
| 55% (64/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (134/260) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 38% (9/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (39/75) |
| 52% (14/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (22/59) |
| 85% (68/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (146/126) |
| 15% (68/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (146/20) |
| 18% (55/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (119/11) |